cage200x200+300dpi A Daily Publication – Exposing The Truth About Geoengineering and Climate Engineering #CAGE #GMACAG #AUCSOG / #ClimateEngineering #Geoengineering #News #ClimateGate #ClimateGateLies @ #UN #IPCC #COP21 #PARIS #EarthToParis #ClimateConference




pariscop209View Or Download The Final COP21 Agreement.PDF -> Here




* Official Disclaimer – “The stated purpose of the geoengineering programs is to “change the temperature of our planet and manipulate the weather” which mimic the consequences of climate change, therefore there can be no accurate, definitive statement made that the planet is warming or cooling. To make such a statement allows the continuing of the destructive geoengineering programs, the deception surrounding them and the further misleading of public opinion!

These denied yet ongoing geoengineering practices that have been going on for over 65 years have not been included in any of the IPCC’s climate models.Interestingly enough the IPCC’s latest report claerly acknowledges that their has been no global warming for close to 19 years in a row now, making the IPCC climate models flawed and fraudulent! This makes it impossible to determine whether the planet is warming or cooling.

Therefore every activist should be demand that global geoengineering programs be stopped before any more climate change talks and legislation is enacted.We feel strongly that geoengineering must be stopped before proceeding with any climate talks, treaties and climate change legislation and mandates.

“COP21 President Laurent Fabius says the final COP21 agreement text is” differentiated, balanced, durable and “Legally-Binding”…Why is this important?


This is important because it gives a new unelected source of authority (UN/IPCC) the ability to enforce laws, taxes and other mandates without our input or the input of our legislators. This is a planned carbon dictatorship and the largest planned transfer of monetary and political power in the course of history. This is very serious!”-


15After nearly two weeks of negotiations, the final COP21 agreement was presented by UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, COP21 President Laurent Fabius, and French President Francois Hollande on December 12 2015.




– COP21 President Laurent Fabius says text is” differentiated, balanced, durable and “Legally-Binding”

– NOT mentioned in the text is the shipping and aviation industries – responsible for around 5% of global emissions and growing rapidly.

– Text “Emphasises” need to keep warming well below 2C”.

– And pushing efforts to keep warming “Below 1.5C”.

– Issues of Differentiation” and loss and damage included.

– No clear timescale of when fossil fuels must be phased out.



Global Warming

On global warming (page 2), the deal “emphasises with serious concern” the need to hold the increase in the global average temperature to “well below 2C” above pre-industrial levels, and “pursuing efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5C”.

To achieve this long-term temperature target, the text states: “Parties aim to reach global peaking of greenhouse gas emissions as soon as possible, recognising that peaking will take longer for developing country Parties.” 

It also includes a ratcheting mechanism on climate action, with countries having to “communicate a nationally-determined contribution” to reducing global emissions every five years. The first “global stocktake” will take place in 2023 and every five years thereafter.


Differentiation, loss & damage

On the key issue of ‘differentiation’ (page 21) – which refers to the different roles and responsibilities of developed and developing nations in addressing climate change – the text continues where it left off with the previous version; recognises that a peaking of greenhouse gas emissions “will take longer in developing countries”.

Developed country should “continue taking the lead” by undertaking economy-wide absolute emission reduction targets, while developing countries “should continue enhancing their mitigation efforts”, and are encouraged to move over time towards economy-wide emission reduction or limitation targets.

The issue of ‘loss and damage’ (page 7) – which essentially considers the compensation for nations dealing with climate impacts – was given its own Article in the text.

It agrees a $100bn-a-year price floor to support developing nations in their climate change mitigation efforts, but crucially the document states that this Article “does not involve or provide a basis for any liability or compensation” for loss and damage – which should keep the US happy. 


13-12-2015 2-18-57 PM

What’s NOT in the text? 

One notable exclusion from this final text is a clear timescale of when fossil fuels must be phased out in the second half of the century. The previous draft said countries would “work towards reaching greenhouse gas emissions neutrality in the second half of the century”. The final text doesn’t.


” Another area that is not mentioned – as with previous draft texts – is the shipping and aviation industries – responsible for around 5% of global emissions but growing rapidly. “


Fabius has, however, hailed an “historic” COP21 meeting, claiming the final text “contains the principle elements that we thought would be impossible to achieve”.

The text is “differentiated, balanced, durable, legally-binding” and will limit global warming to “well below two degrees”, Fabius said. “It always seems impossible until it’s done. None of us acting alone can be successful. Success is built collectively. In this room, you are going to be deciding upon an historic agreement. 

“The world is holding its breath. It counts on all of us.”


What happens next…

This final text is is predicted to be officially adopted when the Conference Of Partis reconvenes later this afternoon, so long as there are no objections raised in a ministerial meeting later this morning. 

In this morning’s session, Ki-moon said “we need all hands on deck” to ensure the text is fully agreed upon and enacted. “The solutions to climate change are on the table – they are ours for the taking,” he said. 

Hollande added: “We will not be judged on a clause in a sentence, but on the text as a whole. History is here – all conditions have been met. There will be no putting this off. A decisive agreement for the planet is here now.”

The final text was apparently only finalized at 6.45am this morning, after negotiators and ministers worked through Wednesday, Thursday and Friday nights at Le Bourget in north-east Paris.


Business action at COP21

Regardless of the ambition of this final text, many observers are confident that the past two weeks in Paris have sent clear signals to businesses, investors and consumers that a low-carbon economy is a globally-shared goal.

Edward Cameron, managing director of lobby group Business for Social Responsibility (BSR), said: “We’re seeing the core building blocks of a new economy coming from this process. Business has come here in unprecedented numbers, to demonstrate their own commitment to acting on climate, and to work with governments to create a truly catalytic instrument for the real economy.”

Big business commitments came in spades throughout the conference, from new carbon reduction targets of 114 firms including Coca-Cola, Sony and Procter & Gamble, to deforestation pledges from Unilever and Marks and Spencer’s, as well commitments to 100% renewable energy from the likes of Google, Adobe and BMW, among others.

Analysts also agree that we will see a significant shift in the global financial system as a result of these talks. During the conference, awareness-raising organisation announced that the global divestment movement now features organisations controlling assets worth $3.4trn, while massive banks and insurers have pledged to scale-up green finance.

The Governor of the Bank of England Mark Carney also helped a new climate change disclosure taskforce, which aims to provide investors with details on company’s climate resilience.

“This is not just about mobilising $100bn per year – it is about creating a leverage mechanism to bring private finance into this equation so that we get to trillions.,” added Cameron from BSR.


So… was COP21 a success?

Professor Lord Nicholas Stern, chair of the renowned Grantham Research Institute, believes the COP21 event has achieved its underlying objectives.

Stern said: “In many ways, this summit has already been a success with more than 180 countries having submitted pledges for action. Over 150 world leaders participated in the opening of the summit and announced a range of initiatives such as Mission Innovation. There has been good will and a spirit throughout these two weeks of negotiation. All these are signs of success.

“Of course, the question is how we accelerate from here – be it on innovation, finance, creativity, investment and so on.”

Despite the cries of success and failure from campaigners and negotiators alike, the true impact of the conference will, of course, not be known for several years yet.

As Heineken’s director of global sustainable development Michael Dickstein told edie before the Paris summit: “The real work starts when COP21 ends. Working on that agreement on a day-to-day basis, making sure it isn’t something written on paper, but something that is put into practice – that is the real challenge.”


The Final COP21 Paris Agreement


Related Articles

Paris Attacks Being Used To Foist Climate Change Legislation And CO2 Control Regime On The World.

Open Letter To Officials Attending The COP21 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference.

Monumental Air Test Planned to Examine Geoengineering.

New Project Expected To Stop Geoengineering

Michael J.Murphy & Dr. J. Marvin Herndon expose the Geoengineering Climategate cover up on American Freedom Radio.






gmacag.banner040115 April 23 2016 Take Action Today Register Your Event #GMACAG –



FAIR USE NOTICE – Many of the stories on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’…you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. – Team CAGE

Order The WHY DVD!

New Unconventional Shade Of Gray Trailer

Donations can be made:
HERE or mailed to:
Please make donations made out to:
“Coalition Against Geoengineering" Coalition Against